Background:
Today, there are currently more than 18,000 local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies in the United States. These agencies employ over 420,000 law enforcement officers tasked with protecting public safety in our communities. Each year, law enforcement conducts over 10 million arrests, resulting in more than 600,000 incarcerations in state or federal prisons. These activities cost taxpayers over $126 billion each year for federal, state, and local law enforcement. It is beyond essential that we, as a people, ensure that these investments in public safety are focused on maintaining a safe and orderly society where individual liberty and property rights are secure.
There is growing understanding and agreement that we need to reform the way our police and citizens interact with each other in the United States. This awakening comes, in no small part, as a result of very public and very tragic police citizen encounters that have resulted in video recordings that are often shocking and scary.
We have watched over the last several years as cellphone video and body cam footage have revealed the often uncomfortable reality of what happens in police-citizen encounters, especially those involving use of force. Police work is not often pretty and it is not often as entertaining as watching an episode of COPS or LIVE PD.
Law enforcement is difficult and inefficient at the best of times in a free society. It is even harder to do well when it is directed at problems it is ill-designed to address. The inherent difficulties are increased when law enforcement operates without the full support of the public. For many reasons, citizens across all walks of life, and African Americans in particular, are feeling a strong need to improve how law enforcement functions in our society. More and more people are seeing where we are and realizing we need to improve. Citizens are asking questions and seeking reform. The questions now become, which reforms should be attempted first and which reforms should be attempted at all?
As we watch, again, hurting citizens stream into the streets of our urban centers to protest and peaceably assemble to petition government for redress of these grievances. Regrettably, we are also forced to watch other behavior. While Americans march to seek reform some choose not to express themselves not with placards and speeches but rather engage in rampant criminal debauchery with Molotov cocktails and bricks.
Sadly, none of this is new. If we are old enough, none of us can ever forget the video of the Rodney King beating. We recall the trials and the awful riots that followed as King himself asked "can't we all just get along?".
In 2015 we watched as Baltimore exploded and a few days into the crisis we heard words no one can quibble with or dispute from President Obama.
"This has been a slow-rolling crisis," he said. "This is not new... "I think there are police departments that have to do some soul-searching. I think there are some communities that have to do some soul-searching....But I think we as a country have to do some soul-searching.""
"When individuals get crowbars and start prying open doors to loot, they're not protesting. They're not making a statement. They're stealing. When they burn down a building, they're committing arson. And they're destroying and undermining businesses and opportunities in their own communities. That robs jobs and opportunity from people in that area."
-President Obama, April 2015 speaking on the Baltimore Riots
Our Path Forward:
My practice of law as a prosecutor and a criminal defense attorney has spanned the last 25 years and over the course of that time I have represented people, black, white and otherwise in Athens and all over the State of Georgia. As I have helped the citizens of Georgia, I have witnessed firsthand the actions of police officers and observed law enforcement cultures from Dalton in the Northwestern corner of our state down to Savannah in the South Eastern corner. From Columbus, to Atlanta, to Milledgeville, to Statesboro and so on. Like the song made famous by the great Johnny Cash, "I been everywhere".
In all I have appeared in court and reviewed police reports and videos in thousands of cases. I do not pretend to have all the answers but I have what I hope is a valuable perspective on the criminal justice system as an insider.
My perspective of over 25 years as a prosecutor and defense attorney leads me to conclude that Policing in America needs reform and we have to break ourselves of some bad habits to see it done. We cannot #defundthepolice that is not a workable response to the problem.
If we really want to fix the problem we have to change the way we police and what police are asked to do. We cannot send people with badges and guns out into the world to solve every societal ill with the force of law. We need to alter our expectations of what police can do and we need to face some hard realities and make some hard choices in what we should be asking them to do.
There is simply way too much authoritarian policing today. Not too many years ago in this country it was much more difficult to have an encounter with the police than it is today in most areas. There are simply too many police-citizen non consensual encounters. Nobody sees problems with anyone saying hello and having a visit with the local officer...that is not the issue. The issues occur when citizens are stopped and detained. The more forced police-citizen contacts the more chances for negative outcomes.
Every time there is a traffic stop or a non consensual interaction where the citizen is not abundantly and clearly free to leave the encounter there is potential for conflict. Some situations are worth the risk of conflict and also worth actual conflict including the use of deadly force but many are simply not.
Here are 10 steps we can take to make the situation much better.
1)
Stop the systematic enforcement of ticky-tack violations, tag lights not illuminated, window tint violations, bald tires, seat belts, etc. I have seen about everything in the book used to justify police stops. End this method of policing.
I regularly practice in jurisdictions where this is the go-to method of policing especially on interstates and highways and I also practice in places where it is not in use. Invariably, the citizens in the non ticky-tack enforcement jurisdictions from the most humble to the wealthy have a more favorable opinion of law enforcement. This is true regardless of religious, racial and financial differences.
Those jurisdictions with aggressive enforcement of minor or regulatory type violations have more problems with both perception and trust. People know when they are being hassled and they know when their neighbors are being given the business. Every single traffic stop holds the potential for things to go wrong. Every stop for jaywalking or an open container violation is also a chance for things to go bad.
We need to rethink what we want from our police and adjust everyone's expectations and actions accordingly. If police make a stop it needs to be because a stop was required...not because it was permissible under some ticky-tack regulation or rule. Situations that pose no risk or only slight risk of harm to the community should cease to be the basis for law enforcement stops. About anything can be justified by claims of safety and we have justified and encouraged way too much in the holy name of safety.
2)
End all non-emergency roadblocks and safety checkpoints as they do more harm than good. Our roadways are very safe on the whole and roadblocks are simply not consistent with American ideals. Restriction of the free movement of citizens is not something the State should lightly engage in. Again every stop is potentially the one that leads to a use of force situation and we simply do not need them. Our yearning for safety has got be tempered with a commitment to good government and we are failing in the area of law enforcement. How about we try something less ominous feeling? After all, "your papers are not in order" should never be a thing in the USA.
3)
Decriminalize drug possession - start with marijuana and see how it goes. We have much to gain and really very little to lose at this point as prohibition has not prevented drug use.
4)
Reform or remove unions for police and prosecutors that make getting rid of "bad cops" difficult (a real problem in some large urbanized areas). No matter how much good has been accomplished by Unions in this country, especially in the past, unionization for public sector employees is fraught with problems.
Since about 2006, not less than 1,881 police officers have been fired from 37 of the largest police departments in the USA for misconduct of various types. But they did not all stay fired, in nearly 25% (451) of those cases, police departments were forced to reinstate the fired officers after an appeal process required by union contracts. Often these officers were able to avoid any type of punishment financial or otherwise even though internal affairs "made a case" on them. Those that were ousted where often allowed to settle the cases against them with early retirement or were able to hire on at another agency regardless of their history, due to union efforts.
In many large U.S. cities, police unions have enormous political clout, just like private sector unions. These police unions contribute to the very politicians that they negotiate their contracts with. Even as we watch mayors and governors making extravagant promises to constituents in the wake of high profile brutality cases such as the death of George Floyd, little can actually be done without police union reform. Until and unless we are willing to address the contracts of the very police unions that in many cases contribute to big city political campaigns, we are stuck. The reform that people, especially those in urban areas are protesting for will likely not be coming.
5)
Stop fighting the failed drug war - just stop already we are not winning. No-knock warrants, etc. are endangering safety every day. Is there any real argument over the efficacy of the drug war? Since the 1970's the USA has been engage in an ongoing battle to combat illicit drug use. Maybe a different approach will do no better but at this point why not try something else.
In addition to all the wasted tax dollars we have squandered many of the protections afforded by the 4th, 5th, 6th and other amendments or sacrificed them in the holy name of safety.
Civil asset forfeiture and no-knock warrants for drug raids are two areas that perfectly illustrate the growth of government power and the usurpation of liberty over the course of the drug war. Forfeiture was begun in an effort to go after the assets of drug kingpins who where difficult to criminally prosecute. Over time, it has expanded to the point where, in my law practice, I am regularly dealing with kids who got mom, or dad or grandma's car seized after a traffic stop and drug arrest. We have to prove to the arresting agency seeking forfeiture that the owner is an "innocent owner".
To seize your car, your money, even your house, the police do not need a conviction. Government can and does seek forfeiture of someone's property without waiting for a criminal conviction or often times without even seeming to care very much about a conviction. Law enforcement and prosecutors then take a share of the proceeds of the forfeitures in a process that provides them with direct, financial incentive to find reasons to seize more property.
No-knock warrants have become a travesty at this point. A no-knock warrant is a search warrant authorizing police officers to enter certain premises without first knocking and announcing their presence or purpose prior to entering the premises. They were conceived as a means to allow police to stop drug suspects from destroying evidence as the police arrived and before they could gain entry or for situations where the danger of executing the warrant was so pronounced that knocking and announcing would subject police to a risk of gunfire and other violence from hardened criminals. But, over time, they have become routine for drug war raids.
Breonna Taylor, 26, and her boyfriend, Kenneth Walker, were in bed when they heard the officers enter at around 12:40 a.m. on March 13 of this year. According to the search warrant, police believed a suspected drug dealer was keeping drugs or money at her house.
Walker, thinking the plain-clothes officers were intruders, called 911. He then pulled out his gun and fired a shot striking one officer’s leg. The raiding officers responded with more than 20 rounds that sailed through the kitchen and living room, fatally striking Taylor eight times. Rounds also penetrated the drywall and exterior and into an adjacent home, where a pregnant woman and a five-year-old child slept. The officers found no drugs on the premises.
Walker was a legal gun owner, and Kentucky law allows people to use deadly force against intruders at home. But the law doesn’t apply when the intruders are police officers who identifies themselves as such. The Louisville officers claim that even with their no-knock warrant, they knocked and announced themselves before forcibly entering Taylor’s home. Walker was charged with felony murder and other charges for firing at the intruders and he says he had no idea those intruders were police. According to lawyers for Taylor's family, neighbors say they heard no knock.
This type of situation is far from rare, usually people avoid getting shot but no-knock raids are all too common and again are justified in the name of safety and fighting the drug war.
You likely recall a tragedy in North Georgia that involved the drug war and no-knock raids. Bounkham “Bou Bou” Phonesavanh was 19 months old during the May 2014 no-knock raid at his family’s Habersham County home. Members of a drug task force were seeking the child’s uncle, who allegedly sold methamphetamine to an undercover officer a day prior, when they burst into the home. A flash-bang grenade was thrown into Bou Bou’s crib, burning his throat and face and landing him in the intensive care unit. The uncle, Wanis Thonetheva, was not at the home during the raid. He was later arrested elsewhere. Over $3.5 million in settlement money was eventual paid for the horrible injuries suffered by the toddler.
Every no-knock warrant carries with it the potential for tragedy and they should be used only as a last resort but instead, the no-knock provisions are pre-printed on the search warrant forms. No knocks and raids are all to often the norm not the exception and this is all down to fighting the drug war.
Enough ought to be enough. Americans still use illicit drugs and all illicit drug prohibition has yielded is corruption, organized crime and misery.
6) Rethink the mandatory arrest policy of the various domestic violence protocols that require the "primary aggressor" to be arrested even when nobody wants an arrest and no one is injured, threatened, or abused.
Recently, studies and anecdotal evidence suggest that as victim support for mandatory arrest increases, the odds of law enforcement notification of the abuse also increases. This seems good. However, studies and anecdotal evidence also understandably reveal that mandatory arrest may also be reducing the probability of reporting domestic among those who do not support the policy. Worse, the data on mandatory arrest policies reveals that mandatory arrest polices result in higher arrest rates of battered women. We do not want to arrest victims of abuse. This outcome will both deprive them of the support they need to escape their situations and of course subject them to jail and the entire criminal legal process as defendants rather than victims. Doing the wrong thing is often worse than doing nothing in the first place and that is especially true in the area of arresting people.
I see these domestic violence cases in my practice where the noble goal of mandatory arrest policies leads to people, including women, being subjected to arrest when they simply do not deserve it. The justice system is supposed to be a system that helps us obtain justice.
Like any situation where a "zero tolerance policy" is supposed to be in place, abuses, injustices and ridiculous outcomes are not nearly rare enough. Everyone of these bad outcomes is directly attributable to the policy designed to help that makes a domestic violence call result in a pervasive "somebody is going to jail" if we come out there approach.
Domestic violence victims need and deserve our support but we need to rethink this factor of our approach to make sure we are not doing harm that can be avoided.
7)
Reform qualified immunity for government actors and agents. According to the Supreme Court, “The doctrine of qualified immunity gives government officials breathing room to make reasonable but mistaken judgments about open legal questions.” Critics, including Supreme Court Justices, will claim that the doctrine “sends an alarming signal to law enforcement officers and the public. It tells officers that they can shoot first and think later, and it tells the public that palpably unreasonable conduct will go unpunished.”
Justice Sotomayor and Justice Thomas of the Supreme Court have expressed concerns and criticisms of qualified immunity and how it is currently applied. Advocates of reforming qualified immunity on the political right tend to emphasize values of law enforcement “accountability” and defense of private property, while the arguments from the left focus on racial justice and broader police reform efforts. The good news is that there is considerable overlap.
Recently, a self-described “cross-ideological” group of organizations filed multiple petitions urging the Supreme Court to take up the issue of qualified immunity. It seems the time has come to reconsider what we want qualified immunity to accomplish and how we want it to function.
8)
Stop expecting and structuring police agencies as our catch-all and cure-all for society. Police are to be engaged in law enforcement, not social work, I'm sorry but that is a simple truth. They need empathy but they exist to apply government force to situations where it is the only viable solution...not to do social work. No number of diversity workshops, body cameras and community policing initiatives will change that.
Being arrested, whatever the outcome, can jeopardize a person’s employment, housing, physical and mental health and parental rights. It doesn't matter whether the charges are eventually dismissed or dropped the harm has been done. When we send police to solve problems we will cause people to be arrested. If they resist arrest they will be forcibly arrested and some of them will be hurt....this remains true even when everything goes exactly right and the police behave perfectly.
Asking police officers to strengthen community relationships by means such as playing football with children or handing out ice cream does not reduce their power to harm people or the nature of their job. It says protect and serve on the side of the cars and police protect us from someone else...some other person or group, what else and who else would they protect us from?
We need to recognize and accept the fact that the police are here to exercise force on behalf of the government. That is their role, to enforce laws...hence we know them as Law Enforcement. They are not guidance counselors or pastors or therapists.
9)
Work to avoid and reduce a culture of us versus them in police departments. There should be no frame of reference that police are somehow different from "civilians"...police are civilians so stop it with that stuff. This cuts both ways and we must accept that police are no better at putting up with abuse, obnoxious treatment, etc. just because they put on a uniform. We want them to be us and to be reflective of our shared values and we need to treat them as such.
It is law enforcement’s idealized role to guard the public against criminal wrongdoers and keep law and order, but officers should avoid the use of excessive force, ensure individual due process protections, and respect the moral dignity of every person. Their dignity as persons should be respected as well. Police have a difficult job and it helps when the public really understand just how difficult.
In recent years, law enforcement agencies across the country have increasingly adopted tactics, equipment, and embraced a culture that is more akin to those seen in the military. This trend has helped to cause a decrease in the perception of legitimacy required to effectively serve our citizens.
Everything that harms trust between communities and law enforcement needs to be scrutinized closely. When a community lacks any real trust in the judgment and basic fairness of the those tasked with protecting their public safety, this negatively impacts law enforcement’s ability to function effectively. Also, when the police are dealing with folks and situations they have little respect for it hurts their ability. Police are people too and they cannot have much empathy for citizens that actively harass and abuse them.
The Golden Rule definitely has a prominent place in public safety.
10)
Stop it with the nanny state stuff already. Learn to love liberty as a culture. Way too many Americans love it when police powers are used on their fellow citizens in ways they would not want to see applied to them. This goes back to the idea that we are failing to understand what the police do and what they are capable of ...also known as "never invite the man into your life". Criminal law and the enforcement of criminal law is a bludgeon, never a scalpel. It should be understood and accepted that it is not the tool of choice but rather is an option of last resort.
"And then we have the audacity and the nerve to get upset with law enforcement when we take action. There is no way in the world that we, as a community, should be calling the police for kids playing ball in the street. No way in the world that we should be calling the police because my neighbor's music is up too loud, because his dog came over to my yard and did a number two; there's no way we should be calling the police. But we have surrendered so much of our responsibility.
Listen, when I was a little boy coming up in Baltimore — and listen, we played rough in the street — I ain't never see the police come and break us up. You know who came? It was the elders. It was the parental figures in the community. It was those guardians, it was that village mentality. They came and said, "Stop that!" and "Do this." and "Stop that." We had mentors throughout all of the community."
-Baltimore Police Lt. Colonel Melvin Russell
Hopefully some of these ideas can spur us forward as we examine what is going wrong with our law enforcement system and how to make helpful changes. We should think critically if whether doubling down on what we have been doing is likely to lead to the results we need. Is continuing to slug it out in the drug war wise? Is yet another round of sensitivity training going to help when police are being cursed and abused? Maybe community outreach from police needs be directed toward not more involvement in citizens day to day lives but less?
There are many challenges ahead. We need to propose and consider answers that offer the possibility of actual changes for the better...more of the same will not get us where we need to be as a society.